When the Supreme Leader Speaks, Who Still Listens?

Image
  By: Struan Stevenson Mojtaba Khamenei inherited the most powerful office in the Islamic Republic. Yet six months into his tenure, a question once considered unthinkable is surfacing in Tehran. When the Supreme Leader speaks, who still listens? For almost five decades, the answer was obvious. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini created a system in which factional warfare could rage beneath the surface, provided everyone ultimately bowed to the Supreme Leader. Ali Khamenei preserved that arrangement for more than three decades. Presidents came and went. Clerics competed. The Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) accumulated power. Yet one principle remained sacrosanct. The Supreme Leader had the final word. Today that principle is under strain. On August 28, Mojtaba Khamenei warned officials against creating false choices between war and negotiation, compromise and confrontation. He urged them to avoid publicizing weaknesses and declared that anything damaging social cohesion was forbidden. The mess...

Tehran’s support for the invasion of Ukraine backfires

 By Farid Mahoutchi

After days of Iranian regime officials openly supporting the Russian war of occupation against Ukraine, regime supreme leader Ali Khamenei tried to soften his regime’s position and justify his support for a war that has been condemned worldwide.



In a speech,  on Tuesday, March 1, Khamenei said, “I think that Ukraine is a victim of American policies. We are of course against the destruction of nations, the killing of people, and the destruction of the infrastructure of nations. We do not approve that.”

Without making any mention of the aggressor, Khamenei tried to shift the narrative toward blaming the United States. “The U.S. brought Ukraine to this point. The U.S. interfered in the internal affairs of that country and assembled rallies against governments, concocted velvet movements, colorful coup d’états, brought U.S. Senators among protest rallies, removed one government, and replaced with another one, and naturally, this is what it led to,” Khamenei said.

While in recent days, the people of Ukraine have shown admirable resilience against the occupation of their Nation, Khamenei—whose regime lacks popular legitimacy, is loathed in Iran and has only maintained his hold on power through violence and repression—said, “The people are the most important asset of governments. Had the people come to the scene in Ukraine, the government and people of Ukraine would not be in its current state. The people did not intervene because they do not believe in the government.”

It is worth reminding that a few hours after Russia’s attack on Ukraine, regime president Ebrahim Raisi in a call with Vladimir Putin said, “The expansion of NATO toward the east causes tension… and is a huge threat to the security of independent countries in different regions.” Raisi also expressed hope that “what is happening will be in the interests of nations and the region.”

In the same vein, regime foreign minister Hossein Amirabdollahian and Friday Prayer leaders, who speak on behalf of Khamenei, justified and supported the invasion of Ukraine.

“The Ukraine crisis has its roots in the provocative actions of NATO,” Amirabdollahian said.

Foreign ministry spokesperson Saeed Khatibzadeh said, “What is happening in this region today is the result of the provocative political, economic, military, and cultural actions.”

Ahmad Khatami, the Friday Prayer leader of Tehran, said, “The Ukraine crisis is the result of American intrusions.”

Clearly, senior regime officials never make such remarks without getting the green light from Khamenei himself. But the backlash by the Iranian people, who have shown their wholehearted support for the people of Ukraine, was so intense that it caused disputes and disarray within the regime’s own ranks.

The state-run Arman newspaper wrote, “Who told Raisi to contact Putin?… At the very least, you should have refrained from saying that you hope the invasion will be in the interests of the nations of the region! Which war and aggression have benefitted people?”

Sharq newspaper reminded that the Russians have never had the regime’s back. “If you want to support the Russians, do so. But did they acknowledge your rights in the Caspian Sea? Did they help in circumventing U.S. sanctions? Did they support us in OPEC? Did they give you space in Shanghai?” it wrote.

The ruling theocracy is stuck in a web of crises, which have become more complicated since Russia began its invasion of Ukraine. The regime depends deeply on the support of Vladimir Putin as it struggles in the nuclear talks. And as Khamenei tries to remain in Russia’s good graces by explicitly and implicitly supporting its invasion of Ukraine, he has created a whole host of new problems for his regime.


This article was first published by english.mojahedin

You can join us on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCY8rfxSSmFhtaVrzFTaRD4g

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Supreme Leader Speaks, Who Still Listens?

Iran: The Poor Tumble While the Rich Rise

Veteran War Commander Takes Over Iranian Regime Security Council